Pakistan raises the alarm on COVID-19 ‘third’ wave
COLOMBO: The Sri Lankan authorities is “in no rush” to implement a proposal to ban the carrying of the burqa and the closure of greater than 1,000 Islamic colleges, cupboard spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella mentioned on Tuesday, including that this was a critical determination that required “consensus and session.” “
“It is going to be applied with consensus and consultations with Muslim organizations and leaders. We is not going to rush the proposal as a result of it’s a significant issue, ”mentioned Rambukwella.
Her remarks got here a day after Pakistani envoy to Colombo Saad Khattak criticized the island nation’s determination to ban the burqa – an outer garment worn by some Muslim ladies to cowl the physique and face – claiming it was was a “divisive” measure impacting Muslims in Sri Lanka. and around the globe.
Khattak tweeted on Monday that the ban would represent an “assault on the emotions of abnormal Sri Lankan Muslims and Muslims around the globe,” including that it could exacerbate financial hardship and gasoline considerations over the state of “fundamental human rights. minorities within the nation ”. . “
Khattak’s assertion follows Sri Lanka’s Minister of Public Security Sarath Weerasekara signing a doc this weekend calling for Cupboard approval to ban the burqa, calling it a “signal of extremism. non secular ”with a“ direct influence on nationwide safety ”.
“The burqa has a direct influence on nationwide safety. It’s a signal of spiritual extremism… Such actions will assist preserve safety… We will certainly ban it, ”Weerasekara mentioned at a press convention on Saturday.
A brief burqa ban was imposed three years in the past after the Easter Sunday bombings, which left 269 lifeless and greater than 500 injured in numerous components of Sri Lanka on April 21, 2019.
The island nation additionally plans to ban greater than 1,000 Islamic seminaries, or madrasas, out of the island’s roughly 2,300 establishments, with Weerasekara saying they have been “not registered with the authorities” or that they didn’t. had not adopted the nationwide training coverage.
If applied, the proposed ban could possibly be the most recent transfer affecting Sri Lanka’s Muslim minority, which accounts for practically 10% of its whole inhabitants of twenty-two million, the place Buddhists make up 70% of the census.
Listening to the federal government’s proposed ban, Hilmy Ahamed, deputy chairman of the Sri Lankan Muslim Council, mentioned: “The federal government’s vilification of Muslims continues to cheat the financial burden imposed on the 6.9 million individuals who voted them in energy. ”
Ahamed additionally highlighted different points confronted by the Muslim group in latest months, together with the compelled cremation of Muslims who died from coronavirus illness (COVID-19).
“They’ve forcibly cremated over 250 Muslims who died from the virus towards their non secular beliefs, and now they need to ban madrasas and burqas,” he informed Arab Information.
“Ladies have the correct to decide on what to put on, particularly now in the course of the pandemic the place face masks are obligatory. Will the identical consideration be given to Buddhist seminaries, which serve the identical goal as madrasas to coach theologians? he added.
Shreen Saroor, co-founder of the Colombo-based Ladies’s Motion Community, agrees, telling Arab Information: “The ban violates the liberty of faith and expression of Muslim ladies.”
She questioned the timing of the federal government to ban the veil on the face and physique “whereas everybody wears masks to guard themselves from the virus”.
“In latest months, there was a rise in Islamophobic rhetoric, and this ban is one in every of them. The Muslim group has mentioned varied reforms, however eliminating what has been practiced for thus lengthy in a single day exhibits how this state views its minorities and the pluralistic nature of our structure, ”mentioned Saroor.
Ahamed agreed, including that if the federal government was “genuinely involved about nationwide safety, it could additionally ban backpacks since suicide bombers typically carry bombs of their backpacks.”
Lawmakers, for his or her half, imagine Sri Lanka’s delay in implementing the ban is a part of its “vote-buying ways.”
“The postponement of the implementation of the ban goals to draw extra votes from Muslim nations to Sri Lanka on the subsequent assembly of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on March 22,” he mentioned. MP Mujibur Rahman informed Arab Information on Tuesday.
“The federal government harasses Muslims. Such actions can have damaging repercussions on the Muslim group, ”he added.
Others mentioned the transfer might have a direct influence on tourism within the nation.
Mr. Ameen, chairman of the Sri Lankan Muslim Council and editor of the favored Islamic weekly Nawamani, informed Arab Information: “The burqa ban will damage the island’s tourism trade as a result of Arab ladies usually tend to dismiss Sri Lanka as a vacationer vacation spot.
“Arab vacationers spend rather a lot and love the island very a lot. This determination could divert them to neighboring nations, ”he added.
Within the years main as much as the COVID-19 pandemic, 71,636 vacationers from the Gulf and the Center East – together with 50% from Saudi Arabia – had visited the island nation, mentioned AM Jaufer, chairman of the Chamber of Tourism and Tourism. trade in Sri Lanka. Information Tuesday.